371 - Should Women Pay Lower Taxes Than Men?

Sponsor Link: Stoic Indifference: Manual of Basic Mental Disciplinehttps://www.amazon.co.uk/Stoic-Indiff...Should women pay lower taxes?https://oxfordtax.sbs.ox.ac.uk/articl...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xyn7x...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video isn't brought to you by any donations. Because once again there aren't any. I'm getting closer to throwing in the towel on daily video production. Probably sometime next year or maybe after my 10 year anniversary which is about a year away. I was going to start a Sigma channel but I'm worried that will eventually get demonetized too. I don't want to deal with the fear of building something that gets demolished again. So most likely I'll start posting my own lego creations in on my travel channel which is monetized. I'm even worried about doing my own commentary on a Lego channel. YouTube clearly is punishing me by forcing me to approve all comments manually as well as not monetize while other MGTOW channels can. If you want me to keep making videos then I need donations. As for today's video Oxford has gone woke. But with higher and higher tuition fees they certainly won't be going broke. Let me now read the most important parts of an article with the same name by someone named Kristoffer Berg and I quote: "If governments are worried about the gender pay gap, why do they not simply tax men more and women less, such that they receive more equal after-tax earnings? Women and men have different income distributions. This figure shows that women have a much more concentrated distribution at middle earning levels in Norway as an example, while at the top of the income distribution there are mainly men. If someone works less when they are taxed more, it is costly to tax them, as their behavior is distorted by the tax. Typically, responsiveness is measured by the elasticity of taxable income. My calculations show that that an increase in the marginal tax rate for women would reduce their pre-tax earnings by about twice as much as the same tax increase would for men. The question is still why women respond differently than men do? More women than men work part time, and this makes it more attainable for women to adjust their labor supply when their taxes change. In total, both the differences in income distributions and in elasticities could support the argument that women should pay lower taxes than men. One possible implementation of that approach could be to introduce a lump sum tax (fee) on men and give the proceeds to women. This would reduce both income inequality and economic distortions. We can observe a few countries that explicitly set lower taxes for women than men. There are often subsidies to mothers. It is also noteworthy that even though there are many advocates for equal pay, there are few advocates for lower income taxes for women. Different occupations have different salaries, and there are more women in sectors with lower pay, such as health care. If this is hard to change, why should governments not use tax policy to compensate women for their lower pay, at least until the gender pay gap is closed? In conclusion, even though tax policy could address the gender pay gap, it does not follow that gender-based taxation is the optimal tax policy. Horizontal equity may provide a justification for why governments, even though they worry about the gender gap, do not set lower income taxes for women than men." unquote. I'll share my thoughts in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Stoic Indifference:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy