5 Popular Arguments for the Shroud of Turin Debunked | Featuring Hugh Farey

Shroud super skeptic Hugh Farey helps us debunk some popular arguments we saw made in the comments section of our previous Shroud of Turin videos: The back wound pattern, the anatomy & nail location, the blood type, pollen, and limestone from the Holy Land. Turns out they aren't as strong as you might think! NOTE: Hugh presents a LOT of images in this one, so you may want to at least pull up the YouTube video afterwards so you can see what you were missing: https://youtu.be/_c43oVE9t2U If you haven't seen our previous Shroud videos, check them out here: Episode 1 (Radiometric dating & invisible patches): https://youtu.be/G4yHs6IjBFQEpisode 2 (Image formation, Radiation, & Chemistry): https://youtu.be/5WOdy3-w6xgEpisode 3 (Art, Pollen, & Patterns): https://youtu.be/j3wffpHYleYDebate w/ Real Seekers: https://youtu.be/xngAYdwAsKM Hugh's links: https://independent.academia.edu/HughFareyhttps://medievalshroud.com/ Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubtFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Timestamps0:00 - Intro1:15 - Hugh Farey’s Background5:30 - Back Wounds/Roman Flagrum11:50 - Trigger Warning - Gore Begins13:23 - Trigger Warning - Gore Ends18:40 - Hand Wounds30:45 - Blood Type44:23 - Pollen58:45 - Limestone1:10:00 - Questioning Shroud Research1:18:00 - Conclusion #skepticism #history #shroudofturin #atheism