Romans from a Torah Covenant Perspective – Chapter 13 Part 3
Torah to the Tribes - Podcast tekijän mukaan Matthew Nolan - Sunnuntaisin
Kategoriat:
Romans 13:8 Owe no one anything except to love one another, for the one who loves another has fulfilled the Torah. Verse 8 tells us not to be indebted slaves, walk in love and fulfill biblical law! V.8 Verses The Articles! Article 1: All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives…..(remember Achan’s house?) Isaiah 33.22 For יהוה is our judge, יהוה s our lawgiver, יהוה is our king; James 4:12 There is one lawgiver. Either יהוה is the source of legislation which is rooted in Torah or the god “We the People” is the source of legislation which is rooted in secular humanism – a moral baby will be born! Article 2: The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his office during the term of four years, and , together with the Vice President, chosen for the term, be elected…… A President: one who ‘presides’ over the throne! Who’s your King? Who has executive authority? As believers we’re to appoint not elect! Article 3: The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme court, and in such inferior courts, as the Congress may, from time to time, ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during goodbehavior….. In the bible, judicial appointees have to be men of truth who fear יהוה and hate covetousness. Not so in the Constitution, no such stipulation. 2 Chronicles 19:5 And he set judges in the land throughout all the fenced cities of Judah, city by city,6 And said to the judges, Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for יהוה , who is with you in the judgment. “No one is good but …..יהוה alone!” Good behavior has to be determined by YHWH’s Torah not secular humanism. Luke 11:52 Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered. Whoever has the power to interpret the law is the supreme legislator. All a jury does is act under cover of law and color of justice. That’s the definition of tyranny! In the Colonoy of New Haven in 1639 they adopted Hebrew law – Torah; and rejected English law – 150 crimes punishable by death were dropped to the biblical 11. Article 6: ……This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land, and judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding. The senators and the representatives before-mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this constitution, but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States. This is the most damning anti יהוה law ever contrived by men. “The Constitution, the laws and all treaties of the United States are the SUPREME law; that all judges and all states are bound by, anything contrary to these laws does not stand and NO RELIGIOUS TEST OATH’S WILL EVER BE REQUIRED – i.e the laws of יהוה are subserviant to the laws of “We the people.” A supreme law can only come from…..a supreme being! Who’s your god? There is a prohibition in the Constitution against Christian test oaths which would have required judges to fear יהוה. Matthew 15:6 Thus have ye made the commandment of Elohim of none effect by your tradition.7 Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,8 This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. Supreme Court decisi